an issue when running regional climate projections on Mistral – in #9: CCLM

in #9: CCLM

Ulrich Schättler wrote:
> Hello Delei
> this sounds like something is going wrong in subroutine get_utc_date (in module utilities.f90), which computes the actual time: This subroutine defines a special integer, which has to be a long integer: quoting from the code:
>
> […]
>
> And from 2005 to 2073, these are just 68 years!
>
> The parameter int_dp is defined in data_parameters.f90 with
> […]
> This worked on all machines and compilers up to now. Maybe for Mistral and the compiler you are using you should try a higher number than 12. You could try with 18. Then you have to recompile the model!
>
> Ciao
> Uli

Dear Uli,

Thanks again for your suggestion, it works very well.

Regards,
Delei

  @deleili in #9efded3

Ulrich Schättler wrote:
> Hello Delei
> this sounds like something is going wrong in subroutine get_utc_date (in module utilities.f90), which computes the actual time: This subroutine defines a special integer, which has to be a long integer: quoting from the code:
>
> […]
>
> And from 2005 to 2073, these are just 68 years!
>
> The parameter int_dp is defined in data_parameters.f90 with
> […]
> This worked on all machines and compilers up to now. Maybe for Mistral and the compiler you are using you should try a higher number than 12. You could try with 18. Then you have to recompile the model!
>
> Ciao
> Uli

Dear Uli,

Thanks again for your suggestion, it works very well.

Regards,
Delei

Ulrich Schättler wrote:
> Hello Delei
> this sounds like something is going wrong in subroutine get_utc_date (in module utilities.f90), which computes the actual time: This subroutine defines a special integer, which has to be a long integer: quoting from the code:
>
> […]
>
> And from 2005 to 2073, these are just 68 years!
>
> The parameter int_dp is defined in data_parameters.f90 with
> […]
> This worked on all machines and compilers up to now. Maybe for Mistral and the compiler you are using you should try a higher number than 12. You could try with 18. Then you have to recompile the model!
>
> Ciao
> Uli

Dear Uli,

Thanks again for your suggestion, it works very well.

Regards,
Delei