The mismatch of the actual and reference date
Hello,
I got date mismatch error ( ERROR CODE : 8102) while running CCLM -v5.0_clm15 with 0.44deg resolution for future period. I have already used almost the same script for the simulation of reference period and I didn’t encounter any problems. You can find my attempts below to solve the problem but the error still exists.
- I restarted the model run after reproducing the int2lm data again.
- I rerun the model by changing number of the processors.
- I restarted the model after replacing the lbfd2092081906.nc file with a working file in case it was corrupted.
I’m attaching the log-file and YUSPECIF . Does any of you have an idea about the reason of the problem?
Cheers,
Cemre
Can you send the output of
ncdump -v time /data/data_int2lm_mpi_med044_rcp85/lbfd2092081906.nc
please.
Can you send the output of
ncdump -v time /data/data_int2lm_mpi_med044_rcp85/lbfd2092081906.nc
please.
Can you send the output of
ncdump -v time /data/data_int2lm_mpi_med044_rcp85/lbfd2092081906.nc
please.
The is an overflow in an integer precision when calculating a time difference. Actually a bug in the program.
Can you try to replace in src_input.f90
iref_act = iref_actsp * 60 + isec - isec_ref !--br 15.05.19
by
iref_act = INT(iref_actsp,int_dp) * 60_int_dp + INT(isec,int_dp) - INT(isec_ref,int_dp) !--br 15.07.20
compile COSMO - CLM and try again?
If this does not work and you are sure that all your input data have the right date you can try to comment out the following lines in src_input.f90 and compile the program again:
IF (iref_act /= itimepassed) THEN
ierror = 10
ENDIFThe is an overflow in an integer precision when calculating a time difference. Actually a bug in the program.
Can you try to replace in src_input.f90iref_act = iref_actsp * 60 + isec - isec_ref !--br 15.05.19
byiref_act = INT(iref_actsp,int_dp) * 60_int_dp + INT(isec,int_dp) - INT(isec_ref,int_dp) !--br 15.07.20
compile COSMO - CLM and try again?
If this does not work and you are sure that all your input data have the right date you can try to comment out the following lines in src_input.f90 and compile the program again:IF (iref_act /= itimepassed) THEN ierror = 10 ENDIF
The is an overflow in an integer precision when calculating a time difference. Actually a bug in the program.
Can you try to replace in src_input.f90
iref_act = iref_actsp * 60 + isec - isec_ref !--br 15.05.19
by
iref_act = INT(iref_actsp,int_dp) * 60_int_dp + INT(isec,int_dp) - INT(isec_ref,int_dp) !--br 15.07.20
compile COSMO - CLM and try again?
If this does not work and you are sure that all your input data have the right date you can try to comment out the following lines in src_input.f90 and compile the program again:
IF (iref_act /= itimepassed) THEN
ierror = 10
ENDIF
iref_act is calculated in src_input.f90 as;
> iref_act = iref_act * 60._ireals + isec – isec_ref
Also, iref_actsp and int_dp wasn’t defined in src_input.f90 so it gives error when I compile COSMO - CLM again. I have attached the src_input.f90
iref_act is calculated in src_input.f90 as;
> iref_act = iref_act * 60._ireals + isec – isec_refAlso, iref_actsp and int_dp wasn’t defined in src_input.f90 so it gives error when I compile COSMO - CLM again. I have attached the src_input.f90
iref_act is calculated in src_input.f90 as;
> iref_act = iref_act * 60._ireals + isec – isec_ref
Also, iref_actsp and int_dp wasn’t defined in src_input.f90 so it gives error when I compile COSMO - CLM again. I have attached the src_input.f90
You do not run the latest version:
https://redc.clm-community.eu/projects/cclm/wiki/Downloads
COSMO-
CLM
-v5.0_clm16.tar.gz
If you use this version even my proposed change in src_input.f90 may not be necessary.
You do not run the latest version:
https://redc.clm-community.eu/projects/cclm/wiki/Downloads
COSMO- CLM -v5.0_clm16.tar.gz
If you use this version even my proposed change in src_input.f90 may not be necessary.
You do not run the latest version:
https://redc.clm-community.eu/projects/cclm/wiki/Downloads
COSMO-
CLM
-v5.0_clm16.tar.gz
If you use this version even my proposed change in src_input.f90 may not be necessary.
You are right, I was running COSMO - CLM -v5.0_clm15 in the latest version of starter package. Now, I replaced it with the new version ( COSMO - CLM -v5.0_clm16) and compiled the program again. Then, I restarted cclm script but it did not work. Finally, I changed iref_act with the proposed line and now it seems cclm is working without error! To be on the safe side, would you suggest simulating the whole time period from the beginning?
Thank you very much for your suggestions and help.
You are right, I was running COSMO - CLM -v5.0_clm15 in the latest version of starter package. Now, I replaced it with the new version ( COSMO - CLM -v5.0_clm16) and compiled the program again. Then, I restarted cclm script but it did not work. Finally, I changed iref_act with the proposed line and now it seems cclm is working without error! To be on the safe side, would you suggest simulating the whole time period from the beginning?
Thank you very much for your suggestions and help.
You are right, I was running COSMO - CLM -v5.0_clm15 in the latest version of starter package. Now, I replaced it with the new version ( COSMO - CLM -v5.0_clm16) and compiled the program again. Then, I restarted cclm script but it did not work. Finally, I changed iref_act with the proposed line and now it seems cclm is working without error! To be on the safe side, would you suggest simulating the whole time period from the beginning?
Thank you very much for your suggestions and help.
Changes from 5.0clm15 to 5.0clm16 are
- corrected a bug for netCDF restart files when running long time simulations:
change some variable definitions to higher precision
affected modules:
-
add cell_method “time: point” to instantaneous quantities.
affected modules:
-
allow for missing_value==-1.E20 in
CIN
_MU,
CIN
_ML,
CAPE
_MU,
CAPE
_ML in case of
netCDF output
affected modules:
These should not affect the results. However, you can also just replace the src_input.f90 in your clm5-code by the one you changed in the clm16 version to avoid inconsistencies in the output meta data.
Changes from 5.0clm15 to 5.0clm16 are
* src_input.f90
- corrected a bug for netCDF restart files when running long time simulations: change some variable definitions to higher precision
affected modules:* netcdf_io.f90
- add cell_method “time: point” to instantaneous quantities.
affected modules:* src_output.f90
- allow for missing_value==-1.E20 in CIN _MU, CIN _ML, CAPE _MU, CAPE _ML in case of netCDF output
affected modules:
These should not affect the results. However, you can also just replace the src_input.f90 in your clm5-code by the one you changed in the clm16 version to avoid inconsistencies in the output meta data.
Changes from 5.0clm15 to 5.0clm16 are
- corrected a bug for netCDF restart files when running long time simulations:
change some variable definitions to higher precision
affected modules:
-
add cell_method “time: point” to instantaneous quantities.
affected modules:
-
allow for missing_value==-1.E20 in
CIN
_MU,
CIN
_ML,
CAPE
_MU,
CAPE
_ML in case of
netCDF output
affected modules:
These should not affect the results. However, you can also just replace the src_input.f90 in your clm5-code by the one you changed in the clm16 version to avoid inconsistencies in the output meta data.
Hello,
I got date mismatch error ( ERROR CODE : 8102) while running CCLM -v5.0_clm15 with 0.44deg resolution for future period. I have already used almost the same script for the simulation of reference period and I didn’t encounter any problems. You can find my attempts below to solve the problem but the error still exists.
I’m attaching the log-file and YUSPECIF . Does any of you have an idea about the reason of the problem?
Cheers,
Cemre