CCLM failed with error code 1004 – in #9: CCLM

in #9: CCLM

<p> Have you checked the output files from INT2LM (las and lbfd) and <span class="caps"> CCLM </span> (lffd)? Are the numbers OK? If a “pint” error occurs it is most likely that there are some inconsistencies in the initial/boundary data set that causes <span class="caps"> CCLM </span> to produce unrealistic values and then the “pint” causes a crash. </p> <p> <span class="caps"> FYI </span> : The following namelist parameters are different to yours from those I have used in a successful simulation (and very likely the external data sets are different). </p> <p> in INT2LM namelist <br/> <pre> itype_w_so_rel=1 itype_rootdp=4 itype_aerosol=1 lfilter_oro=.FALSE. l_bicub_spl=.FALSE. czml_soil_in=0.035, 0.175, 0.64, 1.775, </pre> </p> <p> In <span class="caps"> CCLM </span> namelist <br/> <pre> alphaass=1. ldiabf_lh=.TRUE. itype_bbc_w=1 itype_aerosol=1 itype_evsl=4 lconf_avg=F </pre> </p>

  @burkhardtrockel in #7477cb3

<p> Have you checked the output files from INT2LM (las and lbfd) and <span class="caps"> CCLM </span> (lffd)? Are the numbers OK? If a “pint” error occurs it is most likely that there are some inconsistencies in the initial/boundary data set that causes <span class="caps"> CCLM </span> to produce unrealistic values and then the “pint” causes a crash. </p> <p> <span class="caps"> FYI </span> : The following namelist parameters are different to yours from those I have used in a successful simulation (and very likely the external data sets are different). </p> <p> in INT2LM namelist <br/> <pre> itype_w_so_rel=1 itype_rootdp=4 itype_aerosol=1 lfilter_oro=.FALSE. l_bicub_spl=.FALSE. czml_soil_in=0.035, 0.175, 0.64, 1.775, </pre> </p> <p> In <span class="caps"> CCLM </span> namelist <br/> <pre> alphaass=1. ldiabf_lh=.TRUE. itype_bbc_w=1 itype_aerosol=1 itype_evsl=4 lconf_avg=F </pre> </p>
BR replied

Have you checked the output files from INT2LM (las and lbfd) and CCLM (lffd)? Are the numbers OK? If a “pint” error occurs it is most likely that there are some inconsistencies in the initial/boundary data set that causes CCLM to produce unrealistic values and then the “pint” causes a crash.

FYI : The following namelist parameters are different to yours from those I have used in a successful simulation (and very likely the external data sets are different).

in INT2LM namelist 

itype_w_so_rel=1
itype_rootdp=4
itype_aerosol=1
lfilter_oro=.FALSE.
l_bicub_spl=.FALSE.
czml_soil_in=0.035, 0.175, 0.64, 1.775,

In CCLM namelist 

 alphaass=1.
 ldiabf_lh=.TRUE.
 itype_bbc_w=1
 itype_aerosol=1
 itype_evsl=4
 lconf_avg=F

View in channel