Evergreen and deciduous forest fractions: inconsistencies? – in #9: CCLM
in #9: CCLM
Cookies disclaimer
Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your
device in order to verify your login. These cookies are essential
to provide access to resources on this website and it will not
work properly without.
Learn more
Dear Burkhardt
Yes, exactly. The modified equation is consistent with veg_part = for_e+for_d+veg_low .
Dear Burkhardt
Yes, exactly. The modified equation is consistent with veg_part = for_e+for_d+veg_low .
Thanks for your help.
Sebastian