Evergreen and deciduous forest fractions: inconsistencies? – in #9: CCLM

in #9: CCLM

<p> Dear Burkhardt </p> <p> Yes, exactly. The modified equation is consistent with veg_part = for_e+for_d+veg_low . </p> <p> Thanks for your help. <br/> Sebastian </p>

  @sebastianschubert in #9b72678

<p> Dear Burkhardt </p> <p> Yes, exactly. The modified equation is consistent with veg_part = for_e+for_d+veg_low . </p> <p> Thanks for your help. <br/> Sebastian </p>
SS replied

Dear Burkhardt

Yes, exactly. The modified equation is consistent with veg_part = for_e+for_d+veg_low .

Thanks for your help.
Sebastian

View in channel