SSP CO2 pathways in src_radiation – in #9: CCLM

in #9: CCLM

<p> Hello all, <br/> I saw the email about implementing the new ico2_rad in clm17. I tried to plot the functions of zgco2 for RCP8.5 and SSP858, and here in the figure is what I found. <br/> I am wondering why the differ in the historical period (1950-2005), although they usually are compared after 2005 (such as in O’Neill et al. (2016) figure 3), which means they shouldn’t differ in the historical period. </p> <p> <img alt="" src="https://i.ibb.co/1dwZcpQ/CO2PPM.jpg"/> </p> <p> Best regards, <br/> Mostafa </p>

  @mostafahamouda in #45313f4

<p> Hello all, <br/> I saw the email about implementing the new ico2_rad in clm17. I tried to plot the functions of zgco2 for RCP8.5 and SSP858, and here in the figure is what I found. <br/> I am wondering why the differ in the historical period (1950-2005), although they usually are compared after 2005 (such as in O’Neill et al. (2016) figure 3), which means they shouldn’t differ in the historical period. </p> <p> <img alt="" src="https://i.ibb.co/1dwZcpQ/CO2PPM.jpg"/> </p> <p> Best regards, <br/> Mostafa </p>
MH replied

Hello all,
I saw the email about implementing the new ico2_rad in clm17. I tried to plot the functions of zgco2 for RCP8.5 and SSP858, and here in the figure is what I found.
I am wondering why the differ in the historical period (1950-2005), although they usually are compared after 2005 (such as in O’Neill et al. (2016) figure 3), which means they shouldn’t differ in the historical period.

Best regards,
Mostafa

View in channel