Sensitivity of COSMO-CLM Regional Climate Model to the domain selection – in #8: General Questions

in #8: General Questions

<p> Dear Colleagues, </p> <p> I have repeated the experiment with a larger domain (155×150 grid points) and calculated the <span class="caps"> RMSE </span> for T2M (http://users.met.fu-berlin.de/~BijanFallah/Figure07_RMSE.pdf). </p> <p> As can be seen the previous error pattern near the boundaries for analysis are removed. I guess given that the domain is very large now, the model has more “freedom” and the error patterns in the centre of the domain are simply the internal variability that is larger than the previous settings. </p> <p> Yours Sincerely, <br/> Bijan </p>

  @bijanhassanabadifallah in #0fc9be8

<p> Dear Colleagues, </p> <p> I have repeated the experiment with a larger domain (155×150 grid points) and calculated the <span class="caps"> RMSE </span> for T2M (http://users.met.fu-berlin.de/~BijanFallah/Figure07_RMSE.pdf). </p> <p> As can be seen the previous error pattern near the boundaries for analysis are removed. I guess given that the domain is very large now, the model has more “freedom” and the error patterns in the centre of the domain are simply the internal variability that is larger than the previous settings. </p> <p> Yours Sincerely, <br/> Bijan </p>

Dear Colleagues,

I have repeated the experiment with a larger domain (155×150 grid points) and calculated the RMSE for T2M (http://users.met.fu-berlin.de/~BijanFallah/Figure07_RMSE.pdf).

As can be seen the previous error pattern near the boundaries for analysis are removed. I guess given that the domain is very large now, the model has more “freedom” and the error patterns in the centre of the domain are simply the internal variability that is larger than the previous settings.

Yours Sincerely,
Bijan