Long term simulation – in #12: CCLM Starter Package Support

in #12: CCLM Starter Package Support

<p> The line <code> let "SEC_CHECK=DATE2-DATE1" </code> counts how much time the checking process needs. This is just for information and not necessary for the post-processing of the data. Therefore setting it to <code> SEC_CHECK=1 </code> does not matter. <br/> I experienced some problem with a similar command sometimes in another script. You may try the following instead of using the <code> let </code> command. <br/> <code> SEC_CHECK=$(python -c "print ${DATE2}-${DATE1}") </code> <br/> Anyway, just setting <code> SEC_CHECK=1 </code> is fine, if you do not need the time information for some reason. </p>

  @burkhardtrockel in #5e4efb2

<p> The line <code> let "SEC_CHECK=DATE2-DATE1" </code> counts how much time the checking process needs. This is just for information and not necessary for the post-processing of the data. Therefore setting it to <code> SEC_CHECK=1 </code> does not matter. <br/> I experienced some problem with a similar command sometimes in another script. You may try the following instead of using the <code> let </code> command. <br/> <code> SEC_CHECK=$(python -c "print ${DATE2}-${DATE1}") </code> <br/> Anyway, just setting <code> SEC_CHECK=1 </code> is fine, if you do not need the time information for some reason. </p>
BR replied

The line let "SEC_CHECK=DATE2-DATE1" counts how much time the checking process needs. This is just for information and not necessary for the post-processing of the data. Therefore setting it to SEC_CHECK=1 does not matter.
I experienced some problem with a similar command sometimes in another script. You may try the following instead of using the let command.
SEC_CHECK=$(python -c "print ${DATE2}-${DATE1}")
Anyway, just setting SEC_CHECK=1 is fine, if you do not need the time information for some reason.

View in channel