Model initialization from ERA-Interim data: what happens with soil temperature? – in #10: INT2LM

in #10: INT2LM

<p> Dear Burkhardt, thank you for the answer! </p> <p> 1) In this case, are there any possibility to use T_SO from reanalysis? Or it will be simpler to correct corresponding <span class="caps"> LAF </span> -file before running <span class="caps"> CCLM </span> ? <br/> 2) If soil water content is taken from reanalysis, why I have message that “variable 34 W_SO not needed for boundary fields”? </p>

  @mikhailvarentsov in #46909b8

<p> Dear Burkhardt, thank you for the answer! </p> <p> 1) In this case, are there any possibility to use T_SO from reanalysis? Or it will be simpler to correct corresponding <span class="caps"> LAF </span> -file before running <span class="caps"> CCLM </span> ? <br/> 2) If soil water content is taken from reanalysis, why I have message that “variable 34 W_SO not needed for boundary fields”? </p>

Dear Burkhardt, thank you for the answer!

1) In this case, are there any possibility to use T_SO from reanalysis? Or it will be simpler to correct corresponding LAF -file before running CCLM ?
2) If soil water content is taken from reanalysis, why I have message that “variable 34 W_SO not needed for boundary fields”?