Not all data available – in #10: INT2LM

in #10: INT2LM

Dear all,
I have a problem with simulation from MPI - ESM -LR historical experiment data, 2005 year, region of Chuckchi Peninsula. I have become the following errors (in attached log-file slurm-923246.out), including the final ‘Not all data available’. Unfortunately, I didn’t understand, what kind of data aren’t available in my caf-file… I’m attaching the INPUT file, maybe some specifications for these datasets (i.e., model experiments) are needed.
Thank you very much for any suggestions!

  @vladimirplatonov in #870da4f

Dear all,
I have a problem with simulation from MPI - ESM -LR historical experiment data, 2005 year, region of Chuckchi Peninsula. I have become the following errors (in attached log-file slurm-923246.out), including the final ‘Not all data available’. Unfortunately, I didn’t understand, what kind of data aren’t available in my caf-file… I’m attaching the INPUT file, maybe some specifications for these datasets (i.e., model experiments) are needed.
Thank you very much for any suggestions!

Not all data available

Dear all,
I have a problem with simulation from MPI - ESM -LR historical experiment data, 2005 year, region of Chuckchi Peninsula. I have become the following errors (in attached log-file slurm-923246.out), including the final ‘Not all data available’. Unfortunately, I didn’t understand, what kind of data aren’t available in my caf-file… I’m attaching the INPUT file, maybe some specifications for these datasets (i.e., model experiments) are needed.
Thank you very much for any suggestions!

View in channel

Can you provide the output of
ncdump -h /mnt/msu/users/vplatonov/COSMO_CLM/CLM/IN_DIR/historical/caf2005010100.nc
please?

  @burkhardtrockel in #da9098c

Can you provide the output of
ncdump -h /mnt/msu/users/vplatonov/COSMO_CLM/CLM/IN_DIR/historical/caf2005010100.nc
please?

Can you provide the output of
ncdump -h /mnt/msu/users/vplatonov/COSMO_CLM/CLM/IN_DIR/historical/caf2005010100.nc
please?

Yes, I have attached output of:
ncks -m caf…nc
It is more simple for some reasons… Does it matter?
Thank you.

  @vladimirplatonov in #4e7d84f

Yes, I have attached output of:
ncks -m caf…nc
It is more simple for some reasons… Does it matter?
Thank you.

Yes, I have attached output of:
ncks -m caf…nc
It is more simple for some reasons… Does it matter?
Thank you.

There is no T_SKIN in your boundary caf data file. Therefore please set luse_t_skin = .FALSE.,
in the int2lm namelist.

  @burkhardtrockel in #435a131

There is no T_SKIN in your boundary caf data file. Therefore please set luse_t_skin = .FALSE.,
in the int2lm namelist.

There is no T_SKIN in your boundary caf data file. Therefore please set luse_t_skin = .FALSE.,
in the int2lm namelist.

OK, thank you! Could you suggest, which namelist parameters in COSMO - CLM INPUT have to be switched on/off (or another values) due to this ‘luse_t_skin = .FALSE.’ setting?
Thanks.

  @vladimirplatonov in #9f6bf35

OK, thank you! Could you suggest, which namelist parameters in COSMO - CLM INPUT have to be switched on/off (or another values) due to this ‘luse_t_skin = .FALSE.’ setting?
Thanks.

OK, thank you! Could you suggest, which namelist parameters in COSMO - CLM INPUT have to be switched on/off (or another values) due to this ‘luse_t_skin = .FALSE.’ setting?
Thanks.

Hi all, I have a new queston assoiated with the cited above. I’m using the NCEP - CFSR driving data from DKRZ . INT2LM run doesn’t work, I have attached the log-file (slurm-1054836.out). As I have understand, the problem is in “ T_SKIN is used for T_S” and the following “forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV , segmentation fault occurred” etc. I have changed luse_t_skin from TRUE to FALSE , but the result is the same: *** T(ke) is used for T_S *** (see file slurm-1055109.out). So, the problem is that NCEP - CFSR data doesn’t contain T_S parameter? How can I run INT2LM without using T_S or, maybe, it can be used in another way?
Thank you very much for any suggestions!

  @vladimirplatonov in #ab015a8

Hi all, I have a new queston assoiated with the cited above. I’m using the NCEP - CFSR driving data from DKRZ . INT2LM run doesn’t work, I have attached the log-file (slurm-1054836.out). As I have understand, the problem is in “ T_SKIN is used for T_S” and the following “forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV , segmentation fault occurred” etc. I have changed luse_t_skin from TRUE to FALSE , but the result is the same: *** T(ke) is used for T_S *** (see file slurm-1055109.out). So, the problem is that NCEP - CFSR data doesn’t contain T_S parameter? How can I run INT2LM without using T_S or, maybe, it can be used in another way?
Thank you very much for any suggestions!

Hi all, I have a new queston assoiated with the cited above. I’m using the NCEP - CFSR driving data from DKRZ . INT2LM run doesn’t work, I have attached the log-file (slurm-1054836.out). As I have understand, the problem is in “ T_SKIN is used for T_S” and the following “forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV , segmentation fault occurred” etc. I have changed luse_t_skin from TRUE to FALSE , but the result is the same: *** T(ke) is used for T_S *** (see file slurm-1055109.out). So, the problem is that NCEP - CFSR data doesn’t contain T_S parameter? How can I run INT2LM without using T_S or, maybe, it can be used in another way?
Thank you very much for any suggestions!

Can you provide the namelist?

  @burkhardtrockel in #49dcda0

Can you provide the namelist?

Can you provide the namelist?

Yes, I have attached the INPUT file containing all namelists.

  @vladimirplatonov in #c8955d0

Yes, I have attached the INPUT file containing all namelists.

Yes, I have attached the INPUT file containing all namelists.

The CFSR data are on pressure levels and not on hybrid pressure-sigma levels which is used as default by INT2LM for interpolation. Therefore the data are interpolated to hybrid-pressure first (see subroutine src_pressure_to_hybrid.f90). The interpolation is triggered by the namelist parameter ke_hybrid. ke_hybrid can only take two values 31 and 38 presently. In the case of CFSR you need to set ke_hybrid=38 in the GRID _IN part of the namelist (see example below).
Please also set the following in the CONTRL of the namelist lprog_qi = .FALSE., luse_t_skin = .TRUE.,

 &GRID_IN
  pcontrol_fi =30000., 
  ie_in_tot = 720, je_in_tot = 361, ke_in_tot = 36, ke_hybrid=38,
  startlat_in_tot = -90., startlon_in_tot = -180.,
  endlat_in_tot = 90., endlon_in_tot = 179.5,
  pollat_in = 90.0, pollon_in = 180.0,
  lushift_in=.FALSE.,.FALSE., lvshift_in=.FALSE.,.FALSE.,
  ke_soil_in=3,   
  czml_soil_in=0.05, 0.25, 0.7, 1.5,
 /END

  @burkhardtrockel in #8614fa7

The CFSR data are on pressure levels and not on hybrid pressure-sigma levels which is used as default by INT2LM for interpolation. Therefore the data are interpolated to hybrid-pressure first (see subroutine src_pressure_to_hybrid.f90). The interpolation is triggered by the namelist parameter ke_hybrid. ke_hybrid can only take two values 31 and 38 presently. In the case of CFSR you need to set ke_hybrid=38 in the GRID _IN part of the namelist (see example below).
Please also set the following in the CONTRL of the namelist lprog_qi = .FALSE., luse_t_skin = .TRUE.,

 &GRID_IN
  pcontrol_fi =30000., 
  ie_in_tot = 720, je_in_tot = 361, ke_in_tot = 36, ke_hybrid=38,
  startlat_in_tot = -90., startlon_in_tot = -180.,
  endlat_in_tot = 90., endlon_in_tot = 179.5,
  pollat_in = 90.0, pollon_in = 180.0,
  lushift_in=.FALSE.,.FALSE., lvshift_in=.FALSE.,.FALSE.,
  ke_soil_in=3,   
  czml_soil_in=0.05, 0.25, 0.7, 1.5,
 /END

The CFSR data are on pressure levels and not on hybrid pressure-sigma levels which is used as default by INT2LM for interpolation. Therefore the data are interpolated to hybrid-pressure first (see subroutine src_pressure_to_hybrid.f90). The interpolation is triggered by the namelist parameter ke_hybrid. ke_hybrid can only take two values 31 and 38 presently. In the case of CFSR you need to set ke_hybrid=38 in the GRID _IN part of the namelist (see example below).
Please also set the following in the CONTRL of the namelist lprog_qi = .FALSE., luse_t_skin = .TRUE.,

 &GRID_IN
  pcontrol_fi =30000., 
  ie_in_tot = 720, je_in_tot = 361, ke_in_tot = 36, ke_hybrid=38,
  startlat_in_tot = -90., startlon_in_tot = -180.,
  endlat_in_tot = 90., endlon_in_tot = 179.5,
  pollat_in = 90.0, pollon_in = 180.0,
  lushift_in=.FALSE.,.FALSE., lvshift_in=.FALSE.,.FALSE.,
  ke_soil_in=3,   
  czml_soil_in=0.05, 0.25, 0.7, 1.5,
 /END

Thank you very much! It works. Could you suggest, should I change any namelist parameters in the following cosmo5 run?
Thanks.

  @vladimirplatonov in #7c32ff5

Thank you very much! It works. Could you suggest, should I change any namelist parameters in the following cosmo5 run?
Thanks.

Thank you very much! It works. Could you suggest, should I change any namelist parameters in the following cosmo5 run?
Thanks.

Since there is no cloud ice water lprog_qi = .FALSE. in your INT2LM output, make sure to set in GRIBIN of the CCLM namelist lana_qi = .FALSE., llb_qi = .FALSE.,

  @burkhardtrockel in #bc8cba0

Since there is no cloud ice water lprog_qi = .FALSE. in your INT2LM output, make sure to set in GRIBIN of the CCLM namelist lana_qi = .FALSE., llb_qi = .FALSE.,

Since there is no cloud ice water lprog_qi = .FALSE. in your INT2LM output, make sure to set in GRIBIN of the CCLM namelist lana_qi = .FALSE., llb_qi = .FALSE.,